Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 F.2d 661 - Scheerer v. Rose State College

Scheerer v. Rose State College’s Empirical Analysis

950 F.2d 661 · 1991

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Mascheroni v. Board of Regents of the University of California (1994), Jordan v. Summers (2000)

26 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

370199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · Carnegie v. United States · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Santoni v. United States · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court has held that the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury actions provides the appropriate limitations period for civil rights claims under § 1981, [citing Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. at 660-62 , 107 S.Ct. 2617 ], as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , [citing Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 276-80 , 106 S.Ct. 1938 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) ], but the Court has not yet addressed the issue in connection with § 1982.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a cause of action directly against the EEOC for misprocessing of claims asserted against third-party employers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “false representation by any court, agency, or putative defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.