Gao v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Topalli v. Gonzales · López-Castro v. Holder · Sok v. Mukasey · Xue Deng Jiang v. Gonzales · Vasili v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] petitioner's 'failure to present developed argumentation to the BIA on a particular theory [of relief] amounts to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to that theory.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Persecution' is not defined by statute, and 'what constitutes persecution is resolved on a case-by-case basis.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paye v. Garland · Khalil v. Garland“avoid persecution by relocating - 13 - to another part of [his] country of nationality . . . if under all the circumstances it would be reasonable to expect [him] to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.