James v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 3102 · 16 U.S.C. § 3103 · 16 U.S.C. § 3114 · 16 U.S.C. § 471 · 16 U.S.C. § 473 · 16 U.S.C. § 475 · 16 U.S.C. § 528 (Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960) · 43 U.S.C. § 1311
Relies on Montana v. United States · Shively v. Bowlby · State of Arizona v. State of California · United States v. California · State of Arizona v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). . The original thirteen colonies claimed title to the lands under navigable waters within their boundaries and, because all subsequently admitted states enter the Union on an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'Under the Submerged Lands Act a state receives title to submerged lands unless the United States has 'expressly retained' them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.