Austin v. Kaness’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2024
1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc. · Combined Insurance Co. of America v. Sinclair · Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co. · Miller v. Reiman-Wuerth Co. · Hamilton v. Natrona County Education Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if it is of the kind he is employed to perform; it occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits; and it is actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the master.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.