People v. Reali’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kastigar v. United States · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. · United States v. McDaniel · People v. Naranjo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[in ruling on the motions, the trial court correctly noted that the prosecution had the burden of proving there was an independent legitimate source for the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Stevenson“during which several witnesses, including a deputy district attorney and the district attorney, testified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Stevenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.