Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires that the State prove two things for each conviction. First, the offense resulted in a conviction for DUI; and second, the offense for which the defendant was convicted occurred within five years of the charged offense. Evidence of both the date the offense was committed, normally the date of the arrest, and that the arrest/offense resulted in a conviction are necessary to sustain a conviction under Section 63-ll-30(2)(c).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.