Cunniff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 614 - State v. McClain · 761 So. 2d 324 - Thompson v. State · Moya v. State · Brantley v. Holloway · 920 So. 2d 825 - Pickens v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder these circumstances, the trial court should have either considered the motion on its merits or extended the time for considering the motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“By waiting until the last moment to mail his motion, Mr. Brantley never gave the trial court a meaningful opportunity to rule on his motion within the allotted jurisdictional time. . . . [Additionally, Mr. Brantley] did not request an enlargement of time pursuant to rule 3.050.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“hours after actual receipt of the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.