950 So. 2d 1274 - Brigham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 770 So. 2d 202 - Mendes v. State · Randolph v. State · Mingo v. State · 911 So. 2d 849 - Smallwood v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o other motion shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chamblee v. Florida“Implicit in [ Rule 3.850 ] is the requirement that the judgment and sentence be final before the motion is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chamblee v. Florida
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.