950 So. 2d 243 - Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · United States v. Onori · 735 So. 2d 238 - Hughes v. State · 749 So. 2d 123 - Sheffield v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court's standard of review for the admission or exclusion of evidence by the trial court is very limited. The trial judge has a great deal of discretion in evaluating the relevancy and admissibility of evidence. Jefferson v. State, 818 So.2d 1099, 1104 (¶ 6) (Miss.2002). "Unless the judge abuses this discretion so as to be prejudicial to the accused, the Court will not reverse" the trial judge's rulings. Id. (citing Hughes v. State, 735 So.2d 238, 270 (¶ 134) (Miss.1999)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kea v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.