950 So. 2d 262 - Saucier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 493 So. 2d 365 - Harveston v. State · 909 So. 2d 731 - Dilworth v. State · 898 So. 2d 641 - Price v. State · 851 So. 2d 391 - Boose v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether or not a jury verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence is that the [appellate court] must accept as true all evidence which supports the verdict and will reverse only if convinced that the trial court abused its discretion in not granting a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Christian v. State“verdict is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow the verdict to stand would be to sanction an unconscionable injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Christian v. State“factual disputes are properly resolved by the jury, not by an appellate court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Christian v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.