950 So. 2d 434 - State v. Haddad’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on 750 So. 2d 592 - Wood v. State · 756 So. 2d 42 - Peart v. State · 944 So. 2d 208 - State v. Green · 511 So. 2d 960 - State v. Ginebra · Balogun v. U.S. Attorney General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“WHETHER A DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO VACATE HIS 1981 PLEA ON ACCOUNT OF A LACK OF AWARENESS OF DEPORTATION CONSEQUENCES, WHERE AT THE TIME OF HIS PLEA THE CONVICTION HAD NO DEPORTATION CONSEQUENCES BUT, AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN FEDERAL LAW IN 1996, THE 1981 CONVICTION WAS MADE A MANDATORY BASIS FOR DEPORTATION.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haddad v. State“For pre-1989 cases, a plea may be attacked only if the defendant received positive misadvice of counsel regarding immigration consequences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haddad v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.