¶1ORDER
¶2Appellant, Roland Davis, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.
¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).