Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

950 S.W.2d 330

Tate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-08-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-08-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant, Stanley Tate, appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We affirm.

¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/950/sw2d/330 · .json · Public domain