Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 950 S.W.2d 337 - State v. Rich

State v. Rich’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2010

5 state decisions

20199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley · Invex Holdings, N.V. v. Equitable Life Insurance · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department · State v. Bernard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “What is the defense? The defense is he has a mental defect that compels him, or so he claims, to sodomize and rape little girls; that somehow or another we ought to give him a break because he is driven to sodomize, kidnap, and rape children in our county. [[Image here]] Anybody that goes out and commits these kinds of acts on children obviously has got some problems. * * * The psychologist said he needs to be separated from the rest of society and he needs never be given access to small girls again.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.