State v. Ponder’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2018
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Scharffe v. Perkins · Joseph v. United States · Lovett v. United States · Marquez v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must show-fe accused committed, was accused of, was convicted of, or was definitely associated .with, the other crimes or misconduct. State v. Stoner, 907 S.W.2d 360 , 364 [11] (Mo.App. W.D.1995). Vague remarks cannot be characterized as clear evidence to associate the accused with other crimes. State v. Hornbuckle, 769 S.W.2d 89, 96 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S., 860 , 110 S.Ct. 171 , 107 L.Ed.2d 128 (1989); Stoner, 907 S.W.2d at 364 [11].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.