State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2018
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sidebottom v. State · State v. Sielfleisch · State v. Seddens · State v. Shipley · State v. Yarber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the lesser offense must not require some additional element not needed to constitute the greater offense and ... it is impossible to commit the greater without committing the lesser”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carruth“[i]n order for an offense to be a lesser included offense, the greater offense must encompass all the legal and factual elements of the lesser”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carruth“Due process requires that a defendant cannot be charged with one offense and be convicted of another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.