Olson v. General Dynamics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
951 F.2d 1123 · 1991
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1140 (§ 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ERISA plans) with Pilot Life, 481 U.S. at 47-48 , 107 S.Ct. at 1553 (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Olson] is suing as a participant in the AMEX plan who doesn’t like the level of benefits and believes that the level of benefits was misrepresented. Even if there was a misrepresentation, and the court does not find that there was one, his claim arises as a participant in both ERISA plans and consequently relates to those plans and is preempted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an employee benefit plan are a straightforward application of the standard established by the Supreme Court. To state his claim in the most favorable manner, Olson is alleging that, upon retirement, he received benefits from Amex and SAIC that were”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 90-55688
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.