Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F.2d 1153 - Martinez v. Ylst

Martinez v. Ylst’s Empirical Analysis

951 F.2d 1153 · 1991

Citation profile

176
cited by 176 later decisions
5
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 17 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 176 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (1996), United States v. Sitton (1992)

56 federal appellate · 17 district · 6 state decisions

7101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Rock v. Arkansas · Luce v. United States · Hullum v. United States · 34 Cal. 3d 251 - People v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 176 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “waiver is appropriate unless there are circumstances suggesting that it will work a substantial inequity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “standing alone, ordinarily constitute a waiver of the issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.