Wallace v. Cody’s Empirical Analysis
951 F.2d 1170 · 1991
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins Warden (2000), Robert William Clayton v. Gary Gibson Drew Edmondson (1999)
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez · Taylor v. Wallace · Gregory v. Wyse · Ekstrand v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[W]hen a state prisoner is challenging the ... duration of his physical imprisonment, and the relief he seeks is a determination that he is entitled to ... a speedier release from that imprisonment, his sole federal remedy is a writ of habeas corpus.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“he has no adequate or available state remedy under recent Oklahoma law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[h]abeas corpus is the proper remedy for [reviewing] the withholding of good time credits if the withholding affects the length of confinement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lamb v. Hargett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.