Martinez v. McCaughtry’s Empirical Analysis
951 F.2d 130 · 1991
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Kenneth Wayne Paxton v. Ron Ward (1999), United States v. Linwood (1998)
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Dutton v. Evans · Idaho v. Wright · Pulley v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at a trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“where statements are admissible because they are not hearsay, there is no confrontation clause problem”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we go beyond the inference of reliability, looking to the record to see if it supports admission under [the excited utterance] exception”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.