Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F.2d 1504 - Gluth v. Kangas

Gluth v. Kangas’s Empirical Analysis

951 F.2d 1504 · 1991

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2016 · most notably Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey (1996), Gentry v. Duckworth (1995)

52 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

650199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Bounds v. Smith · Procunier v. Martinez · Honig v. Doe · Toussaint v. McCarthy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Bounds requires the assistance of those 'trained' in the law; the appearance of minimal capacity to assist other inmates alone plainly does not suffice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison officials to assist inmates in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the existence of an adequate law library does not provide for meaningful access to the courts if the inmates are not allowed a reasonable amount of time to use the library”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.