Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F.2d 16 - Feinstein v. Moses

Feinstein v. Moses’s Empirical Analysis

951 F.2d 16 · 1991

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Morillo (1993), Aybar v. Crispin-Reyes (1997)

39 federal appellate · 5 district ·

370199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1400

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Kashif v. United States · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Tompkins v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “applies only where a party has performed an act which, if properly done, would postpone the deadline for filing his appeal and has received specific assurance by a judicial officer that this act has been properly done.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “pro se status [does not] absolve [a litigant] from compliance with the Federal Rules of Procedure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where an appellant has filed a belated motion for reconsideration and relied on the district court's statement that the motion was timely in forgoing the timeous filing of a notice of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.