Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F.2d 417 - Mitchell v. Hobbs

Mitchell v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis

951 F.2d 417 · 1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
June 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2011

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

120199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Ackermann v. United States · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · United States v. Throckmorton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 60(b)(6) may not be used to escape the consequences of the movant's dilatory failure to take a timely appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.