Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F.2d 521 - United States v. Kopp

United States v. Kopp’s Empirical Analysis

951 F.2d 521 · 1991

Citation profile

231
cited by 231 later decisions
July 2022
most recently cited

194 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 231 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Bertoli (1994), United States v. Fagan (1993)

194 federal appellate · 4 district ·

18701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Miller v. Florida · Chapman v. United States · Sullivan v. Finkelstein · United States v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 231 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n fraudulent loan application cases ... where the defendant's capabilities are fraudulently represented, the loss is the actual loss to the victim (or if the loss has not yet come about, the expected loss).”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is, in the first instance, the amount of money the victim has actually lost (estimated at the time of sentencing) not the potential loss as measured at the time of the crime. However, the”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if an intended loss that the defendant was attempting to inflict can be determined, this figure will be used if it is greater than the actual loss.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.