Wooten v. Loshbough’s Empirical Analysis
951 F.2d 768 · 1991
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Bankers Trust Company v. Old Republic Insurance Company (1992), Doe v. Roe (1992)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc. · Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades · Mid-State Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago · Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We may assume that the defendant's activities made it less likely that [the plaintiff] would collect her judgment; and probabilistic injury is enough to establish standing in the Article III sense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Herbst v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.