Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F.2d 977 - Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. City of Long Beach

Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. City of Long Beach’s Empirical Analysis

951 F.2d 977 · 1991

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably National Audubon Society, Inc. v. Davis (2002), Sd Myers Inc v. City and County of San Francisco (2001)

12 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

150199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Bell v. Burson · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · City of New Orleans v. Dukes · Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “asserted benefits of the statute are in fact illusory.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Because of the advertisement and public announcement of flights, maintenance of these allocations is crucial to the continued functioning of their enterprise. A license such as these allocations, which is not the subject of an absolute entitlement but which nevertheless becomes 'essential in pursuit of a livelihood,' is 'not to be taken away without that procedural due process required by the Fourteenth Amendment.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In Bell , the Court held that the revocation of a license for cause could not occur before notice and a meaningful hearing was provided. See 402 U.S. at 541-42 , 91 S.Ct. at 1590-91. Leave to land one’s planes at the airport is similarly a property interest closely associated with the pursuit of a livelihood; therefore, due process also requires notice and a hearing before flight allocations can be revoked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.