Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 F. Supp. 2d 578 - Singleton v. Clash

951 F. Supp. 2d 578 - Singleton v. Clash’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2255 · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1658 · 28 U.S.C. § 2409A

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · United States v. Kubrick · Urie v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Under the discovery rule, a claim accrues when a plaintiff comes into possession of the 'critical facts that he has been hurt and who inflicted the injury.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.