Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 NE2D 277 - Huddleston v. State

Huddleston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Harshman v. State · Ross v. State · Taylor v. State · Stephenson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]espite the trial court's efforts to extract an unequivocal admission ... we cannot square any such admission with [the defendant's] statements, made during the same proceeding, that he lacked the requisite culpability for that offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.