Eiteljorg v. Eiteljorg’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. Boehm · Estate of Stanley v. Pence · Farner v. Farner · Nance v. Miami Sand & Gravel, LLC · Hanson v. Valma M. Hanson Revocable Trust
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The ... commentary [to section 205(c) of the Restatement] clarifies that the lost profits contemplated by Restatement section 205(c) and corresponding Indiana Code section 30-4-3-11(b)(3) are those profits lost to the trust corpus due to a trustee's misuse of or failure to acquire trust property. Sections 205(c) and 30 -4 -3 -11(b)(3) are not addressed to the scenario where, as here, a trustee has withheld trust property from a beneficiary, and we do not read these provisions to allow compensation for individual profits that beneficiaries allegedly would have generated on their personal shares but for a trustee's failure to timely distribute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.