Nash v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Delva · 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · 684 So. 2d 736 - Chicone v. State · 808 So. 2d 166 - Scott v. State · State v. Medlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who knowingly sells, purchases, manufactures, delivers, or brings into this state, or who is knowingly in actual or constructive possession of, 28 grams or more of cocaine, as described in s. 893.03(2)(a)4., or of any mixture containing cocaine, but less than 150 kilograms of cocaine or any such mixture, commits a felony of the first degree, which felony shall be known as “trafficking in cocaine,”....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Failing to instruct on an element of the crime over which the record reflects there was no dispute is not fundamental error and there must be an objection to preserve the issue for appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thames v. State“out of the standard jury instruction for trafficking in cocaine because the legislature made knowledge of possession an element of the crime of trafficking and that element was”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thames v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.