Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Alabama v. Smith · 845 So. 2d 142 - Wilson v. State · State v. Warner · 446 So. 2d 1079 - Maselli v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As regards factors (1) and (2), if the judge participates in the plea negotiations beyond what is contemplated by Warner, or by his or her comments appears to have departed from the role of a neutral arbiter, then these actions alone may give rise to a presumption of judicial vindictiveness that would shift the burden to the State to produce affirmative evidence on the record to dispel the presumption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baxter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.