Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 951 So. 2d 575 - Shanks v. State

951 So. 2d 575 - Shanks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 249 So. 2d 414 - Curry v. State · 921 So. 2d 292 - Spicer v. State · 913 So. 2d 198 - Walker v. State · 925 So. 2d 797 - Flora v. State · 915 So. 2d 442 - Shaw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Mjarijuana destroys communities. It destroys families, children. I mean, God knows, maybe some of you or whatever — you know. I hope not, but, you know, we have people that we know that’s been touched by that stuff, whether it’s that or some other drug. That’s why it’s against the law to sell it, whether we like it or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.