951 So. 2d 910 - Stubbs v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 682 So. 2d 1085 - State v. Montague · 698 So. 2d 571 - Fitzhugh v. State · Wright v. State · 731 So. 2d 9 - Spell v. State · 872 So. 2d 308 - Matton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant may challenge the inclusion of [sentencing] points at a revocation proceeding even when those points were not challenged at the original sentencing or on direct appeal. This rule applies even where the defendant pleads pursuant to a negotiated plea if he or she did not specifically agree to the inclusion of the points on the scoresheet.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] defendant may challenge the inclusion of [sentencing] points at a revocation proceeding even when those points were not challenged at the original sentencing or on direct appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.