951 So. 2d 97 - State v. Jaramillo’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 758 So. 2d 110 - State v. Kalogeropolous · 766 So. 2d 1137 - State v. Ortiz · State v. Paleveda · 835 So. 2d 392 - Bell v. State · State v. James
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court cannot dismiss criminal charges simply because it concludes that the case will not survive a motion for judgment of acquittal at trial. Moreover, if the State bases its charges on circumstantial evidence, whether that evidence excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence may be decided only at trial, after the evidence has been presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.