State v. Condran’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 366th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Olson · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · Lee v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the prosecution, unless otherwise ordered by the court, for good cause shown, supported by affidavit, shall be dismissed....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“A discharge under ... Article 32.01 of this code is a bar to any further prosecution for the offense discharged and for any other offense arising out of the same transaction ....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The powers of the Government of the State of Texas shall be divided into three district departments, each which shall be confided to a separate body of magistracy, to wit: Those which are Legislative to one; those which are Executive to another; and those which are Judicial to another; and no person, or collection of persons, being of one of these departments, shall exercise any power properly attached to either of the others, except in the instances herein expressly permitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Frenzel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.