Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

951 S.W.2d 365

Diemer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-09-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2003

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant pled guilty to one count each of attempted stealing, tampering in the first degree, and stealing property valued over one hundred fifty dollars. He filed this Rule 24.035 motion alleging his plea counsel was ineffective for not informing him he was required to serve eighty percent of his sentence, and that the motion court failed to advise him of the parole implications of the plea.

¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/951/sw2d/365 · .json · Public domain