Hendler v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
952 F.2d 1364 · 1991
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 213 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States (2002), Creppel v. United States (1994)
36 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 213 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the bundle of rights we call property, one of the most valued is the right to sole and exclusive possession-the right to exclude strangers[.]”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) ... clearly unreasonable, arbitrary, or fanciful; (2) ... based on an erroneous conclusion of the law; (3) ... clearly erroneous; or (4) the record contains no evidence on which the ... [special master] rationally could have based his decision.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[N]or shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” U.S. CONST, amend. V. 2 . On the meaning of “permanent”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.