Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

952 F.2d 1396

Docket No. 91-7672.

Williams v. Miller

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 24, 1991. Decided Jan. 21, 1992.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-01-21

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Mary Ann E. Lewellyn, United States of America v. Thomas L. Lewellyn

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-01-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, No. CA-90-2867-HM, Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.

Hubert James Williams, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Hubert James Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Miller, No. CA-90-2867-HM (D.Md. June 28, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/952/f2d/1396 · .json · Public domain