Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 F.2d 1533 - Larson v. Heritage Square Associates

Larson v. Heritage Square Associates’s Empirical Analysis

952 F.2d 1533 · 1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Sanders v. Clemco Industries · Hoffman v. Celebrezze · Bradford Exchange v. Trein's Exchange · Fox v. Brewer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when Larson withdrew his settlement offer. The record, however, belies this claim. Larson's counsel was present when the previously proposed settlement was read into the record in Funk's bankruptcy proceeding. At the pre-trial conference, Larson's counsel demonstrated his familiarity with that proposed settlement. For example, he informed the court that that proposed settlement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Our position is ... we'd be more than happy to settle this case, but we would like to see the documents to be rest (sic) assured that the partnership is operating.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was not knowledgeable about the settlement negotiations because the proposed settlement had become moot after September 21, 1990,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.