Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 F.2d 214 - Lubinski v. Sullivan

Lubinski v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

952 F.2d 214 · 1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2004
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Walker v. Bowen · Adams v. Weinberger · Ness v. Sullivan · Metcalf v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that he has lost self-control to the point of being 'impotent to seek and use means of rehabilitation,' and (2) that his disability is encompassed by the Act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “unless the evidence is strong enough to support the outcome despite the lapse”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.