Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 F.2d 232 - Garner v. Strauss

Garner v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis

952 F.2d 232 · 1991

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Abramowitz Dds v. Palmer (1993), Benn v. S

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

240199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Samore v. Graham · Napotnik v. Equibank and Parkvale Savings Association · Otto F. Stifel's Union Brewing Co. v. Saxy · Grosslight Liberty State Bank and Trust v. Grosslight

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(h) Notwithstanding subsection (f) of this section, the trustee may sell both the estates’s interest ... and the interest of any co-owner in property in which the debtor had, at the time of the commencement of the case, an undivided interest as ... tenant by the entirety, only if— (1) partition in kind of such property among the estate and such co-owners is impracticable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(j) after a sale of property ... the trustee shall distribute to the debtor’s spouse ... and to the estate, the proceeds of such sale ... according to the interests of such spouse ... and of the estate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any property that is exempt from attachment and execution under the law of the state of Missouri,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.