United States v. Challenge Air Int'l Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
952 F.2d 384 · 1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Moratzka v. Visa U.S.A. (In Re Calstar, Inc.) (1993), Bank United v. Manley (2001)
3 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · United States v. National Bank of Commerce · Phelps v. United States · United States v. Huckabee Auto Co. · United States v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[sjection 541(a)(b) (sic) speaks in terms of the debtor’s “interests ... in property,” rather than property in which the debtor has an interest, but this choice of language was not meant to limit the expansive scope of the section. The legislative history indicates that Congress intended to exclude from the estate property of others in which the debtor had some minor interest such as a lien or bare legal title.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Had the Supreme Court intended to restrict its holding to situations involving tangible saleable property, it either would have not recognized a conflict between Cross Electric and Whiting Pools I and refused to grant certiorari, or it would have, at the very least, indicated that no conflict existed between the two decisions in view of the different types of property involved.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“principle that the Commissioner acts pursuant to the collection process in the capacity of lienor as distinguished from owner”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.