952 F. Supp. 2d 203 - Tuttle v. Salazar’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 84 · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on Van Dusen v. Barrack · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Lamont v. Haig · 944 F. Supp. 13 - Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture · 238 F. Supp. 2d 174 - Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global Ministries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“choice of forum receives diminished deference because this jurisdiction is not his home forum,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“receives more APA claims than its western colleagues”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stewart v. Azar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.