952 F. Supp. 2d 439 - Zaltz v. JDATE’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“-which is where counsel works-is located at the address. ( See, e.g. , ECF No. 1 at Ex. H, Ex. I, Ex. F.) Moreover, at least one of the attachments show that Feng Chen lives in Fort Worth, Texas. (ECF No. 1 at Ex. C.) The plaintiffs do not submit any evidence to the contrary. Because neither the defendants nor the plaintiffs reside there, the attorney's office location cannot support venue in this district unless a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to this claim occurred there. 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (e)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Where a disparity exists between the means of the parties the court may consider the relative means of the parties in determining where a case should proceed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“defendant’s reference to its Terms and Conditions of Service appear above the button” that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Meyer v. Kalanick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.