Warren v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd. · Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the exclusive right to ... reproduce, perform publicly, display publicly, prepare derivative works of, and distribute copies of, his copyrighted work.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is premised on concealment so that the plaintiff cannot specify the time and place because no affirmative act occurred, the complaint must still allege: (1) what the omissions were; (2) the person responsible for the failure to disclose; (3) the context of the omissions and the manner in which they misled the plaintiff; and (4) what the defendant obtained through the fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To the extent that [plaintiff] intends to assert copyright claims regarding these unspecified photographs, that portion of his Complaint is dismissed.”); Schneider, 2013 WL 1386968 , at (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.