Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 NE2D 263 - Bellamy v. State

Bellamy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hazeltine Corp. v. RCA Corp. · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department · Robertson v. Isomedix, Inc. · Hopping v. State · Simpson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a finding of contempt, we accept as true the statement entered by the trial court. This Court will interfere with the judgment only where it clearly appears the acts do not constitute contemptuous acts. Contemptuous acts are those in opposition to a court’s authority, justice, and dignity. Any act related to a current or pending proceeding that tends to deter the court from the performance of its duties may support a finding of contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.