Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 NE2D 269 - Warren v. Warren

Warren v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Whorley · Small v. Centocor, Inc. · Microvote General Corp. v. Indiana Election Commission · Lake Monroe Regional Waste District v. Waicukauski · Warren v. IOOF CEMETERY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our standard of review is identical to that of the trial court: whether there exists a genuine issue of material fact and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Appellate review of a summary judgment motion is limited to those -materials designated to the trial court. In addition, all facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts are construed in favor of the nonmoving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.