Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 NE2D 377 - Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cardwell v. State · Rutherford v. State · State v. Maghee · McCann v. State · Taylor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The legislature reasonably may have concluded that because conspiracies do not necessarily result in actual harm to a victim, and often require less proof of detrimental conduct in order to convict a defendant than as to the completed crime, it would not include conspiracies to commit a `crime of violence' within the definition of `crime of violence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not require proof that the defendant or a cohort actually committed or even attempted to commit the underlying crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he agreement itself constitutes the criminal act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.