Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 P.2d 187 - State v. ML

State v. ML’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2019

18 state decisions

130199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 113 Wash. 2d 929 - Forbes v. City of Seattle · State v. Sledge · State v. Talley · 23 Wash. App. 789 - State v. Strong · 54 Wash. App. 81 - State v. Tauala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to uphold a disposition outside the standard range, an appellate court must find that the reasons supplied by the disposition judge are supported by the record which was before the judge, that those reasons clearly and convincingly support the conclusion that a disposition within the range would constitute a manifest injustice, and that the sentence imposed was neither clearly excessive nor clearly too lenient.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. K.E. · 194 Wash. 2d 314 - State v. B.O.J.
  2. “Once a juvenile court has concluded that a disposition within the standard range would effectuate a manifest injustice, the court is vested with broad discretion in determining the appropriate sentence to impose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. TEH · 194 Wash. 2d 314 - State v. B.O.J.
  3. “`only when it cannot be justified by any reasonable view which may be taken of the record.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Ogden · State v. TEC

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.