Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 952 P.2d 577 - Reedeker v. Salisbury

Reedeker v. Salisbury’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2023

1 district · 16 state decisions

1101998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baltimore Co v. Baugh · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · 42 Cal. 3d 490 - Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn. · MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. Nelson · Colman v. Utah State Land Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the general rule is that a corporation is an entity separate and distinct from its officers, shareholders and directors and that they will not be held personally liable for the corporation's debts and obligations.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co. · 2001 UT App 287 - Orlob v. Wasatch Management
  2. “'[Blecause the Association is a corporation, it may not act in any way not authorized in its ... articles of incorporation or bylaws.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 2005 UT App 327 - Okelberry v. WEST DANIELS LAND ASSOCIATION · Levanger v. Vincent
  3. “[A] director is not personally liable for his corporation's contractual breaches unless he assumed personal LHability, acted in bad faith or committed a tort in connection with the performance of the contract. This is true even where the director, while acting in his official capacity, took actions that resulted in the breach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 2009 UT App 385 - Dale K. Barker Co., PC v. Bushnell

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.